Solutions for Expanding Data Usage
February 26, 2009 at 3:58 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: Femtocell, Mobile Internet profitability, UMA
Q: What would you do if your business costs were forecast to increase 100X?
A: Find ways to cut costs!
Operators In Search of Solutions
Having established the long-term trend of exploding data growth (see previous analysis “Problem: Data Traffic Growing Faster than Revenues“) and the consequent threat to profitability (see previous analysis “100X Data Growth vs. 2X Revenue Growth“), Operators are already looking for ways to offload or eliminate cost, and multiple solutions will be required. The problem represents a severe threat to mobile network operators (MNOs): perhaps 100X growth of aggregate data vs. 2X growth of revenue (in the next 5 years). This unrestrained growth in cost is not just a threat to the nascent mobile internet business, but to the entire industry, since the MNOs rely on mobile Internet services for revenue growth. If your Cost Of Goods Sold (COGS) increased 100X, what would you do? Find ways to cut out fat!
This problem is so severe that it must be addressed systemically, with multiple solutions. Since the growth in cost is 100X, no single fix can deliver that reduction in total cost of data delivery. LTE is not a silver bullet that can magically solve this problem: LTE offers, perhaps a 6X cost reduction against a tide of 100X growth in use (and therefore marginal cost). Analysys recently examined the business case for LTE and found that LTE could cut the cost of delivering a MB of data to 1/6 of its current level: from € 0.60 to € 0.10 pr MB. Since the delivery of data service is composed of many components, each component will have to be scrutinized and cost-reduced for the system to reach the necessary cost reduction.
Where is the greatest amount of CAPEX and OPEX in the value chain, and what are the greatest opportunities for cost reductions? Here is a list of promising candidates for reducing the cost of a segment of the data value chain, listed from high-level applications to low-level bit transport (not in order to total, potential cost reduction):
- Elimination of Handset Subsidy
Operators seek to eliminate handset subsidy since it represents a large, initial, per-subscriber cost. Some markets already have migrated to this model. In the U.S., for example, Clearwire is pioneering this model by focusing on the End User benefit of using any compatible device to their network.
- Handset OS standardization
The current handset market is filled with many competitors-too many competitors-that split the effort in developing an delivering handsets and applications. Competition will cull the field to a smaller number. Operators have made this concern known and have already started to implement this, within their own domain. Unfortunately, when each carrier reduces the number of handset OSs used, it does not effectively reduce the total number of OSs in the industry, as each operator may have a favorite. This reduction will, therefore, take time to play out, as the industry slowly reaches a consensus and pares down the list of providers.
- Prioritization & Content-specific Billing, Policy-Based Control & Enforcement, Subscriber-awareness, and Fair Use Enforcement
Operators can be more efficient in delivering traffic by smoothing out demand (reducing peaks demand) by prioritizing usage into classes (e.g., conversational VoIP traffic has stringent delivery requirements, whereas email can be delivered using whatever remaining capacity is available, as “best effort” delivery). Overall data traffic can be intelligently managed, so that congestion is reduced. In particular, fair use enforcement is likely to be invoked to avoid a few users hogging the available bandwidth. In some fixed broadband networks, 5% of users consume 80% of the bandwidth. By significantly reducing peak demand, less network capacity is required, reducing network cost.
- Flat, Enhanced Packet Core (EPC), Architecture
In LTE, the IP access architecture is flattened and simplified, allowing the architecture to be delivered in fewer components and connections to be achieved with fewer hops. This significantly reduces the cost and increases the scalability.
- IP Backhaul (e.g., via Metro Ethernet)
This is the single, greatest opportunity for reducing Operating Expenses (OPEX), since transport costs represent as much as 45% of OPEX. High-speed IP backhaul is becoming available in metro areas, and can replace the use of costly and cumbersome dedicated circuits (e.g., E1/T1) and point-to-point microwave when connecting hundreds of cell sites back to the mobile network.
- RAN Sharing
Where allowed by regulation, multiple MNOs can share a single, common RAN, avoid duplication of capital and operational resources. This can save perhaps 30% of RAN costs for each operator.
- Monitor Resource Usage
Available bandwidth can be efficiently shared by use of active monitoring and policy control.
- Femtocell and UMA
These techniques promise to radically reduce the capital and operating expense of delivering mobile broadband, by (a) offloading traffic from the existing, macrocellular network to small cell sites installed in the Home and Workplace of End Users. MNOs not only offload traffic, but they also obtain significant cost reduction by obtaining free use of End User resources. Femtocells obtain free backhaul from the End User; UMA obtains free backhaul, radio (Wi-Fi) and spectrum (Wi-Fi).
- Increase RAN Capacity (e.g., Spectral Efficiency via LTE)
By delivering more bits to more users over the same spectrum, the cost of radio spectrum (a large, initial investment that can be $1 Billion or more) is reduced. Ongoing improvements in radio techniques continue to provide greater and greater efficiencies, delivering 10X capacity improvements from current to planned systems (i.e., recent advances included in HSPA+ and LTE, such as OFDMA and MIMO).
Only by relentlessly and systemically reducing the cost of each of the components can we hope to maintain profitability as traffic (and cost) continues to increase dramatically. Femtocells, especially, hold a great deal of promise as they can simultaneously cut away the major CAPEX and OPEX costs-as described separately in “Femtocells: A Key Cost Reduction, via Offload.”
Femtocells: A Key Cost Reduction, via Offload
February 26, 2009 at 3:57 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: Femtocell, Mobile Internet profitability, UMA
Femtocells, in particular, represent an excellent method for MNOs to offload this expanding data use onto End Users’ networks-completely relieving the MNO of major CAPEX and OPEX costs! When an End User installs a femtocell in their home, the MNO obtains:
- free or reduced cost radio access network (RAN),
a major CAPEX and OPEX cost
- free backhaul (from RAN to network) and site rental,
the major OPEX cost
This solution may revolutionize the way that MNOs deploy their radio networks: instead of purchasing and installing very expensive “macro” cell sites to cover large areas, the MNO partners with the End User to deploy many, cheap, femtocells to deliver capacity where the End User needs it. Certainly, femtocells can efficiently divert/offload traffic (from the MNOs) by delivering excellent coverage and high capacity access where people consume it (perhaps 75% of use in their Home and Campus/Office environments).
Operators need major cost reduction in the delivery of radio access, as the current method is extremely costly, so they will drive Femtocell technology to a successful outcome and deploy them wherever mobile internet is available for free backhaul. Without femtocells, MNOs are forced to deploy more radios, leading to costly RAN enhancements. And MNOs are increasing their spending on radio networks, reflecting their reliance on adding macrocellular capacity. ["Mobile Networks Forecasts: Future Mobile Traffic, Base Stations & Revenues," Informa, www.informatm.com/networks, 7/2008]
In a very short time, femtocells may become the dominant method of delivering coverage and capacity to subscribers. Operators are just starting to deliver service with femtocells costing $200, but the Cost Of Goods (COGS) will undoubtedly drop quickly as Femto deployments expand from thousands to millions.
Although Femtocells are an excellent way for MNOs to reduce or eliminate some of their largest cost components, femtocells are but one of many ways that MNOs will cut costs in delivering data services (enumerated in a previous analysis, “Solutions for Expanding Data Usage“).
Enterprises: UMA or Femto?
February 14, 2009 at 5:38 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: Femtocell, UMA, Wireline replacement
Q: Which solution best serves an Enterprise or Campus: UMA or Femto?
A: UMA, then Femto
Summary: the best approach for an enterprise is “UMA first, Femto later”—the same recommendation that I’ve made for individual subscribers at Home, but for different reasons. Enterprises can start savings today with UMA. This allows the enterprise to reap significant savings now, with an Enterprise Mobility solution that can evolve and use Femtocells as they become available. No use waiting on a cool, new technology to save the day … especially when you have no idea on what benefits and pricing will be offered to you.
Our company agreed to deploy “UMA now, Femto later.” We easily came to this conclusion after a recent, enterprise-wide review of UMA vs. Femto with our IT and Telecom team for a moderately large, multi-location company (2,500 employees in large and small offices around the world). It is a relevant question for enterprises, with UMA available and Femto coming. We concluded that we should start the savings now for several, independent, use cases:
- At Work or On Campus: Reduce Mobile Charges, and potentially eliminate Wireline service (PBX/CENTREX/VoIP)
- When Roaming: Eliminate Roaming Charges
- At Home Office: Eliminate Wireline + LD Charges
Note: Any Enterprise can start using UMA for selective End Users, for each Use Case.

What Benefits Will Operators Provide With Femtocells?
Start saving with UMA today, as we do not know what the future holds. The undeniable truth is that Enterprise femtocells do not yet exist, we don’t know for sure when they will be deployed, or what benefits (if any) will be offered to the Enterprise by the Mobile Operator. So it makes no sense to put off savings, if your operator is offering them (as is our case in the U.S., with free, unlimied voice and data service using UMA over Wi-Fi).
Femtocells, when available for the Enterprise, will be welcomed by the End User but will present new concerns for the Enterprise:
- It is easier for the End User to use Femto—no change is required (versus learning how to use UMA over Wi-Fi).
To eliminate any learning curve, I suppose that the handset could be pre-configured for the user to use the (a) enterprise WLAN and/or (b) Home WLAN, but that is still a manual process that is not fun to consider for 1,000 handsets. I believe that this step (and others) can be automated for some devices, such as automatically configuring BlackBerry devices with the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES). However … - It is not easier for the Enterprise to use Femto—many changes are required.
As I discussed with my IT organization, it requires a lot of carrier- and equipment-specific work for the carrier and IT organization to integrate the femtocells with the Enterprise routing and power, resulting in a carrier-specific configuration that locks the Enterprise to a single carrier. The enterprise will, quite literally, be an extension of the Mobile Operator’s Network, with lots of femtocells attached to their walls and routers. I worked for AT&T Mobility when we pioneered this solution (”Wireless Office Service,” using an earlier, more costly and complex microcell technology), and once installed, it is likely to stay in place due the inconvenience and cost of installing a new solution. Enterprise Mobility solutions are very “sticky” (and therefore extremely attractive for the Mobile Network Operator to lock in high-ARPU subscribers).
Eventually, for nearly all of us, Enterprise femtocells will be a wonderful thing for End Users on campus, just as they are in the Home. However, the technology is not there yet. Nearly all femotcells are low-capacity (up to 4 simultaneous calls), suitable for the residence. Only Huawei has a product that supports significant capacity (16 simultaneous calls) [see Light Reading report] and the first Mobile Network trials are starting (by Orange/FT and AT&T Mobility) [see Femto Trials and Deployments]. We simply can not predict certain, near-term success for enterprise femtocells with the confidence that we embrace Home femtocells. And, most importantly for enterprises, we will have to wait and see what service plans and benefits are offered to enterprises that allow their buildings to be an extension of the operator’s radio network. Will the mobile operator generously offer free, unlimited, on-campus voice and data service (as is offered with most UMA plans today)? Or will the operator be stingy, and offer no cost savings (as does Verizon Wireless with their “Network Extender” Home Femtocell, requiring the End User to purchase the unit, and offering no discounted/free usage)?
Conclusion: Reap savings now using free voice and data (using UMA over Wi-Fi) in the Enterprise just as at Home.
UPDATE: What Qs should an Enterprise ask regarding in-building wireless? Which technology would you deploy? Check out the excellent discussion on this topic, “Six Questions for Enterprise IT departments deploying Femtocells” at ThinkFemtocell. David & I discuss the pros and cons of Femtocell and UMA deployment in the Enterprise.
Femtocell Trials and Deployments (to date)
January 11, 2009 at 2:32 am | In Uncategorized | 5 CommentsTags: Femtocell, UMA
Let’s watch the roll-out of femtocells, as it should be interesting to track the rate of commercial success, including:
- Which operators are leading the deployment
(I foresee that the first deployments will be from either a) a short list of data-centric incumbents and b) other, innovative competitors, as described in this recent post) - How femtocells are used by operators,
- What type of femtocell is used
(there are several, different technical and capacity configurations available now and in the near future)
Here’s the current data that I’ve collected. If you have an update, please do send it to me (email can be sent to me here). Please also check out David Chambers’ assessment of the U.S. femtocell market.

Femtocell Trials and Deployments (as of 2/19/2009)
Which Operators Need to Deploy Femtocells?
January 10, 2009 at 5:41 pm | In Uncategorized | 1 CommentTags: Femtocell, UMA, Wireline replacement
Which Mobile Operators Need to Deploy Femtocells?
(A) Incumbents: Strong, Data-centric carriers (seeking efficient offload)
AND
(B) New Competition: Innovative players making a dent in existing wireline and wireless players
Incumbent candidates (category A) include (in order of data-centricity):
- NTT DoCoMo
- China Mobile
- KDDI
- Verizon Wireless
- AT&T Mobility
- Sprint Nextel Launched 8/2008
- China Unicom
- Softbank Launched 11/2008
- O2 UK
- T-Mobile USA
“New Competition” operators are defined in each market (there’s not a top 10 list for this category), but you can recognize them within each market as they:
- Significantly lag the incumbent provider(s)
Benefit: Femto improves coverage) - Innovate to succeed
- Only provide mobile services
(since operator does not currently deliver wireline service, they can provide a Femto solution that includes wireline at marginal cost)
Benefit: Cost savings for Subscriber, greater service revenue for Operator
Already there is an operator in this category (third to market, with the most advanced product deployment to date): StarHub, a cable-based (ISP) mobile competitor in Singapore. Another example would be SFR, who can leverage their broad, DSL customer base through Neuf Cegetel, of which SFR owns 40.5 % stake (as Unstrung opined in June 2008).
Note: Femtocells will become mainstream and will be widely adopted. These are the operators that will lead the delivery of Femtocell solutions, due to their competitive needs.
Watch the actual operator trials and deployments here (I plan to keep this updated to allow us to track the progress of femtocell deployment and to test my hypothesis).
Wi-Fi Appearing in Smartphones
November 19, 2008 at 12:59 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: UMA, Wi-Fi, Wireline replacement
It’s encouraging that many of the top handsets are starting to include Wi-Fi. 11 of the top 15 smartphones reviewed by PC Magazine include Wi-Fi! And Wi-Fi support is trickling down into mainstream (less expensive) handsets, as the core chipsets incorporate this as a basic feature. Accordingly, the number of Wi-Fi handsets is expected to double every two years (50% growth per year) [ABI Resrarch, 2009], to the point where half of the handsets will include Wi-Fi in 2012. A previous post discussed the current handsets that work with @Home and include Wi-Fi and UMA software, and included forecasts for lots more Wi-Fi handsets on the horizon.
The top, Wi-Fi capable handsets are (in alphabetical order, not by rank):
- BlackBerry Curve 8320/8330 Available from T-Mobile for @Home
- BlackBerry Pearl 8120 Available from T-Mobile for @Home
- Apple iPhone 3G
- HP iPAQ 910 (unlocked)
- HTC Touch Diamond (unlocked)
- Palm Treo Pro (unlocked)
- Palm Treo 800w
- Samsung SCH-i760
- Nokia E71 (unlocked)
- Nokia N78 (unlocked)
- Nokia N95 (unlocked)
But, recall that @Home requires not just Wi-Fi but also UMA software. For details, see the previous post on UMA handsets.
Too bad we can’t just grab our favorite (unlocked, Wi-Fi enabled) handset and use it on @Home. I seriously doubt that there is a way to get a UMA client installed on an unlocked phone of your choice, as a 3rd-party app, since the UMA software is configured to reach inside the carrier’s network. Such an app would typically not be user-configured, nor would the config settings even be visible. But, hey, unlocked phones can be configured for other IP services (MMS, web browsing), so it’s possible.
If anyone knows of a way to get a UMA app installed on an unlocked phone, please let me know!
Comparing Femto vs. UMA Service: Sprint AIRAVE vs. T-Mobile @Home
November 8, 2008 at 1:50 am | In Uncategorized | 3 CommentsTags: @Home Service, Femtocell, UMA
Q: What is the best solution for delivering mobile capacity in your Home/Office?
A: T-Mobile @Home has the edge
Or, technically speaking, how does a real-world exampleof UMA compare with Femtocell? (Note: If this makes no sense to you, and you desire to geek out, check out my previous post on the technology alternatives that mobile operators are using to deliver service in your home/office).
Estimate for single person subscription, two-year use.
Restriction: T-Mobile requires a 2-year service contract, Sprint has no contract requirements.
SUMMARY: @Home costs less and offers more features, but probably requires you to get a new handset(so you start out a bit further in the hole). Sprint AIRAVE could be less expensive if you only need improved indoor coverage ($5/month), but if you desire unlimited calling, it’s $15/month. I compared apples vs. apples, using unlimited calling. Sprint AIRAVE is less expensive if used only for better service coverage ($5/month), without the option of unlimited at home calling ($15/month). However, subscribers may find that unlimited in-home use can reduce their monthly bill, if they are able to revise their service plan to select a lower bundle of minutes.
Outlook: UMA will continue to be the best choice for the consumer for years. The only downside for UMA is the limited choice in phones (always a barrier for dual-mode solutions such as this, and typically a strong barrier to consumer adoption, since handset choice is a very personal thing for many users). Consumers will have a much broader choice of handsets over time, with many more UMA phones expected to be available, with as many as 50% Wi-Fi capable by 2012.
Why? Wi-Fi technology (and UMA) is already mature, so the costs are much lower. Consumer cost of the Femtocell will only slowly decline, as Femtocells become mature and start to sell in volume (In contrast, costs are already very low for the Wi-Fi + VoIP router). Operators will therefore tend to charge more to the consumer for the Femto than the comparable UMA solution.
UMA, then Femto
October 31, 2008 at 2:15 am | In Uncategorized | 1 CommentTags: Femtocell, Hotspot @Home, UMA
These are two answers to the same question:
How can mobile operators deliver network capacity and coverage in-building, at lower cost?
I like UMA near-term, and Femtocell after several years. My bet is on UMA, near-term, as the difficulties of wide-scale use of Femto appear to be quite significant-beyond the abilities of current solutions for RF planning. In the long-term, Femto may be wonderful, but only after vendors and operators figure out how to dynamically deliver new femtocells, recognize (and update) their location, as well as operate and maintain these in concert. Both solutions are available today, but UMA is proving easier to deploy while LTE has greater, long-term benefit.
Mobile operators will soon need solutions such as UMA and Femto, as they will be pressured to deliver far greater data capacity without far greater compensation. Costs are rising faster than revenue. Several studies suggest that operators will need to deliver 100 times the data capacity, without comparable increases in revenue. Accordingly, operators will need to find innovative solutions such as radio and handset, which are their largest, areas of per-subscriber expenditure.
Both UMA and Femtocell offer considerable savings to the Mobile Operator, and some benefits for the subscriber:
The big concern about UMA is that it is available only in selected handsets(T-Mobile offers less than 10 that are compatible with their @Home and Hotspot @Home service). Some operators (such as Orange) like UMA’s benefits so much that they are pushing for more UMA-capable handsets. To be successful, subscribers must not be penalized as a result of using a UMA service (such as @Home), so there will have to be a wide variety of handsets delivered with UMA and Wi-Fi. Getting UMA into handsets is easy, over time, but the likelihood of adding Wi-Fi in large percentages is a bet. Some forecasts show that as many as 50% of handsets could include Wi-Fi by 2012. Until those handsets are widely available, operators will have to pay for special features and handsets.
The big concern with Femto is network integration: the operator must integrate numerous, small cells placed randomly in buildings into their highly-tuned, macrocellular network. This is a formidable task, and has held up the widescale use of femtocells. Not only must the manufacturer miniaturize an existing base station (and deliver it in a form factor that the subscriber can just plug in and connect to their Internet service), but the operator then must identify the location of the cell (for 911 Emergence Services) and integrate its footprint of service with all surrounding cells. Recall that UMA does not have these formidable problems: cheap Wi-Fi routers work fine (no miniaturized GSM Base Station required), and the UMA Wi-Fi devices do not interfere with the existing cellular network, so no radio planning is required.
Data Traffic Growing Faster than Revenues
Operators expect to be stressed in the near future to deliver more data for less, as subscribers will consume far more data capacity (as all services move to IP) but they are not expected to pay much more. Thus, operators need to diminish major cost components, such as handset, radio, and backhaul. UMA and Femto are right on target to achieve this. Advanced network architectures, such as HSPA+ and LTE also promise far greater efficiency, delivering data bits for a fraction of their current cost. How fast could traffic grow? Some forecast that “The appetite for data could increase 100-fold,” [Tom Keathley, VP of Technology and Standards, "HSPA/LTE Workshop," 2/2008] as illustrated below [3GAmericas and Rysavy Research]. Consider the recent growth examplified by the data use of iPhone subscribers, with vastly greater use of Internet, email, YouTube videos, etc. “Global mobile data revenues will increase 77% from 2007 to 2012, but global mobile data traffic will grow far faster, increasing more than 1000% over the same period.” [Informa] [see also the blog report from Mike Roberts, Principal Analyst, Informa] Operators will be squeezed, so they must find areas to reduce costs.
UMA and Femto: A Marriage of Fixed + Mobile
It is possible that UMA and Femto create an opportunity for the fixed operators to get back in the mobility game, if only as a bit player. Check out the excellent, insghtful article by InCode, Sangit Rawlley, on how fixed operators can still benefit from this transition and complement mobile operators.
Further Reading: There’s a fine overview (by Peter Thornycroft or Aruba Networks) of Femtocells in the recent issue of Wireless Design Magazine, that reviews the technology, standards (or lack of), benefits, and barriers to deployment. FierceWireless continue to provide very good coverage of this (and other emerging technologies).
Your Choice of Phones (for use @Home)
September 26, 2008 at 7:51 pm | In Uncategorized | 4 CommentsTags: @Home Service, UMA, Wi-Fi, WMM
Expect a much wider variety of phones that you can use with @Home in the near future.
As much as half the mobile phones sold in 2012 will support Wi-Fi (see figure from ABI Research, and Gartner forecasts similar penetration), so you will start to have this feature built into your favorite phones. T-Mobile is way ahead of the curve in offering this service and, unfortunately, there are few phones that work with it. Most subscribers desire Wi-Fi on their handset (56% of users, [Wi-Fi Alliance and Kelton Research, 2007]), but few carriers are interested in providing it, as it provides an alternative, free method for subscribers to obtain data and load content onto their phones.T-Mobile will add phones with Wi-Fi that can be used with @Home. The BlackBerry Curve is a fine phone, but it’s not for everyone.
The number of Wi-Fi handsets is expected to double every two years (50% growth per year) [ABI Resrarch, 2009].Over 50 Wi-Fi enabled phones were certified in 2Q2008, which represented a significant increase-hopefully the start of a larger wave of devices. So, while your choices in mobile phones (and routers) are very limited today for Voice over Wi-Fi, you should have a lot of choice in a year or two.
In addition to Wi-Fi, an @Home handset also needs to support UMA (Unlicensed Mobile Access), the service that allows the phone to connect to the mobile operator’s network over the Wi-Fi connection. So, unfortunately, just any Wi-Fi capable GSM phone will not do. For a complete list of @Home phones, please see the list, below:
@Home Compatible Phones: (as of 20 October 2008)
- BlackBerry 8900 (”Javelin”) Curve update
- BlackBerry 8320 Curve

- BlackBerry 8820

- BlackBerry 8120 Pearl

- BlackBerry 8220 Pearl flip

- Nokia 6301

- Samsung Katalyst
- Samsung T339
- Samsung T409 (initial Hotspot @Home flip phone, no longer sold by T-Mobile)
- Nokia 6086 (initial Hotspot @Home flip phone, no longer sold by T-Mobile)
- NOT an unlocked GSM phone that includes UMA and Wi-Fi
Technically possible, but in practice impossible. Only T-Mobile approved handsets will work, due to the tight connection of an approved app on the handset. I’m all for buying the (unlocked) handset that you want and running it on the network of your choice, but (as with the iPhone), this means that tightly coupled features will be lost. - NOT your (Wi-Fi-enabled) T-Mobile Dash or T-Mobile Wing,
since they do not support the necessary UMA (Unlicensed Mobile Access) client that works with @Home service.
Soon you will be able to readily identify devices that support Voice over Wi-Fi (like your @Home router) for personal use. The Wi-Fi Alliance is planing to certify devices in 2009, much as they currently certify devices for their support of other standards, such as faster speed (IEEE 802.11g and n). If you want to know more, please see the nice summary that Wirevoltion.com provided here.
Enhancing Range and Audio Quality of @Home (UMA)
September 22, 2008 at 3:27 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: @Home Enhancements, UMA
Q: Want to increase the range of your wireless @Home system,
and ensure that you have the best audio quality?
Solution: Improve the signal strength and range of your wireless LAN.
Audio can cut out unacceptably if the phone is receiving a weak Wi-Fi signal (and a mobile handset’s received is typically not as good as a laptop’s, so your actual range is less than you might expect). I noticed this when using T-Mobile ‘s Hotspot @Home service, so I boosted the range and signal strength of my WLAN signal with an inexpensive, Wi-Fi repeater. I recommend the D-Link DWL-G710 <http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=357> ($50, very easy to set up). This effectively doubled the range of my Wi-Fi network by placing a repeater where my Wi-Fi phone started to have difficulty in maintaining a connection. More importantly, it extended coverage to an area of the home where I was dropping calls due to weak Wi-Fi signal.
Alternatively, @Home service allows you to expand your WLAN including handoff of calls between multiple APs (so long as the APs are on the same subnet and using the same SSID). Although that might seem like an easy solution, in practice it is not easy to deliver in a home as it requires that the APs obtain wired Ethernet which is not typically available at multiple points in a residence. This is a fine solution for seamless service on an enterprise WLAN, but not for a residence.
Future Enhancement (for T-Mobile, not you):
A limitless solution to wirelessly expand the range of the @Home Wi-Fi radio coverage exists, but the Linksys @Home router does not support <http://gizmodo.com/archives/why-apples-airport-express-may-unofficially-extend-nonairport-networks-015834.php> the WDS <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Distribution_System> (Wireless Distribution System <http://www.connect802.com/wireless_bridging.htm> ) standard to connect to other Wi-Fi Access Points (using the same SSID), which would allow you to expand your WLAN with any number of devices. The benefit of WDS is that the APs only need power-not Ethernet-as they relay the messages securely as a coordinated mesh. This is an excellent solution for a home or moderate-sized enterprise. Unfortunately, WDS is not guaranteed to work across different vendors’ products; although WDS is a IEEE 802.11 standard and many vendors implement it <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Distribution_System> , its interoperability is not assured since the Wi-Fi Alliance does not test is as part of the certification process. It typically works with other routers, but it’s currently not a sure thing. WDS is a good option since it allows you to expand your WLAN without having to run Ethernet.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.




![Wi-Fi Phone Shipments 500 Million Wi-Fi Phones Sold in 2012 [ABI Research]](http://imcellular.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/wi-fi-phone-shipments-abi-3-2008.jpg?w=294&h=335)



